UGC APPROVED ISSN 2278-1412

Archive

  Volume 15 | Issue 6

  Volume 15 | Issue 3

  Volume 15 | Issue 2

  Volume 15 | Issue 1

  Volume 14 | Issue 12

  Volume 14 | Issue 11

  Volume 14 | Issue 10

  Volume 14 | Issue 9

  Volume 14 | Issue 7

  Volume 14 | Issue 6

  Volume 14 | Issue 5

  Volume 14 | Issue 4

  Volume 14 | Issue 3

  Volume 14 | Issue 2

  Volume 14 | Issue 1

  Volume 13 | Issue 12

  Volume 13 | Issue 11

  Volume 13 | Issue 10

  Volume 13 | Issue 9

  Volume 13 | Issue 8

  Volume 13 | Issue 7

  Volume 13 | Issue 6

  Volume 13 | Issue 5

  Volume 13 | Issue 3

  Volume 13 | Issue 1

  Volume 12 | Issue 12

  Volume 12 | Issue 11

  Volume 12 | Issue 10

  Volume 12 | Issue 9

  Volume 12 | Issue 8

  Volume 12 | Issue 7

  Volume 12 | Issue 6

  Volume 12 | Issue 5

  Volume 12 | Issue 4

  Volume 12 | Issue 3

  Volume 12 | Issue 2

  Volume 12 | Issue 1

  Volume 11 | Issue 12

  Volume 11 | Issue 11

  Volume 11 | Issue 10

  Volume 11 | Issue 8

  Volume 11 | Issue 7

  Volume 11 | Issue 6

  Volume 11 | Issue 3

  Volume 11 | Issue 1

  Volume 10 | Issue 12

  Volume 10 | Issue 8

  Volume 10 | Issue 6

  Volume 10 | Issue 3

  Volume 10 | Issue 2

  Volume 10 | Issue 1

  Volume 9 | Issue 10

  Volume 8 | Issue 11

  Volume 8 | Issue 7

  Volume 7 | Issue 8

  Volume 7 | Issue 7

  Volume 7 | Issue 6

  Volume 7 | Issue 5

  Volume 7 | Issue 4

  Volume 7 | Issue 3

  Volume 7 | Issue 2

  Volume 7 | Issue 1

  Volume 6 | Issue 12

  Volume 6 | Issue 10

  Volume 6 | Issue 9

  Volume 6 | Issue 8

  Volume 6 | Issue 7

  Volume 6 | Issue 6

  Volume 6 | Issue 5

  Volume 6 | Issue 4

  Volume 6 | Issue 3

  Volume 6 | Issue 2

  Volume 6 | Issue 1

  Volume 5 | Issue 12

  Volume 5 | Issue 11

  Volume 5 | Issue 10

  Volume 5 | Issue 9

  Volume 5 | Issue 8

  Volume 5 | Issue 7

  Volume 5 | Issue 6

  Volume 5 | Issue 5

  Volume 5 | Issue 4

  Volume 5 | Issue 3

  Volume 5 | Issue 2

  Volume 5 | Issue 1

  Volume 4 | Issue 12

  Volume 4 | Issue 10

  Volume 4 | Issue 8

  Volume 4 | Issue 7

  Volume 4 | Issue 6

  Volume 4 | Issue 5

  Volume 4 | Issue 4

  Volume 4 | Issue 2

  Volume 4 | Issue 1

  Volume 3 | Issue 10

  Volume 3 | Issue 8

  Volume 3 | Issue 6

  Volume 3 | Issue 5

  Volume 3 | Issue 4

  Volume 3 | Issue 3

  Volume 3 | Issue 2

  Volume 3 | Issue 1

  Volume 2 | Issue 12

  Volume 2 | Issue 11

  Volume 2 | Issue 10

  Volume 2 | Issue 9

  Volume 2 | Issue 8

  Volume 2 | Issue 7

  Volume 2 | Issue 2

  Volume 1 | Issue 9

  Volume 1 | Issue 8

  Volume 1 | Issue 7

  Volume 1 | Issue 6

  Volume 1 | Issue 4

  Volume 1 | Issue 3

  Volume 1 | Issue 2

  Volume 1 | Issue 1

Current Volume 15 | Issue 07

Trusted Medical Data Sharing Framework for Edge Computing


Volume:  15 - Issue: 06 - Date: 30-06-2026
Approved ISSN:  2278-1412
Published Id:  IJAECESTU500 |  Page No.: 101-110
Author: Preeti Mahara
Co- Author: Ankur Patney , Swati Khanve
Abstract:-The rapid growth of the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), edge computing, and cloud healthcare systems has transformed modern healthcare services. However, secure medical data sharing remains a major challenge due to privacy leakage, unauthorized access, data tampering, and high communication latency. Traditional centralized healthcare systems also suffer from scalability issues and single-point failures. This paper proposes a Trusted Medical Data Sharing Framework (TMDSF) integrating Edge Computing, Blockchain, IPFS, and Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption (CP-ABE) for secure and decentralized healthcare data exchange. Edge nodes provide low-latency processing, blockchain ensures decentralized trust and immutable record management, CP-ABE enables fine-grained access control, and IPFS offers distributed storage for encrypted medical records. A mathematical model is developed for latency, throughput, encryption complexity, energy consumption, and security analysis. The framework is validated using Python-based simulation and blockchain transaction emulation. Experimental results show that the proposed TMDSF framework achieves 38% lower latency, 42% higher throughput, 51% reduced attack success rate, and 33% lower encryption overhead compared to traditional healthcare systems. The proposed framework is suitable for smart hospitals, telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, and next-generation digital healthcare infrastructures.
Key Words:-IoMT, Edge Computing, Blockchain, CP-ABE, IPFS, Healthcare Security, Medical Data Sharing, Smart Contracts, Telemedicine
Area:-Engineering
Download Paper: 
Preview This Article

Unable to display PDF file. Download instead.


Download Paper

Downlaod Paper

No. of Download

0007

Impact Factor

7.6


ijaece

Upcoming Events


Special Issue For Paper


Upcoming Conference


Call For Paper